Helium

Helium You write articles on basically anything you want and as a result, you get paid. You can enter a variety of contests that range from "write-to-win" to "debate" to "20 topic" to "channel champion" and more and as a result, you earn even more. If you join and refer friends, you earn even more. It's not just a great writing opportunity, it's a great business opportunity and a great source of income, if you donate a lot of time and effort to it. Helium is an amazing website and an opportunity for all writers looking for a source to get their start. Helium is also recommended to any individual with an opinion or general intuition. Their primary focus is universalism. It doesn't matter if you live in South of France or in the outskirts of Hong Kong, you are welcome at this website. Whether you are Iranian, Italian, or Philipino; Straight, gay, or bisexual; a homeless bum or a Harvard grad, Helium needs you. You must be 13 years of age to join. Where Knowledge Rules. Click here and sign up right now!

Check out...

The Beauty Lounge
Music 143
Science Avenue
The Psychology Lounge
Persian 143 (new blog)
Jewelry 143 (new blog)

and more

Ryan's Thoughts On "Bisexuality"

I am truly honored to post something from a person I have never met, but hope to in the future. This guy is someone who possesses a very strong intellect. A person who's opinion I value on a variety of wavelengths. He is bisexual and his name is "Ryan".

Anyways, Ryan and I recently got into a very deep conversation on Myspace about bisexuality. People believe that everyone is "Monosexual" and there must only be "Heterosexual" or "Homosexual". I disagree. I believe there are quite a few orientations on this earth. Anyways, this is what Ryan he had to tell me...

As I think I mentioned to you before, Sarah, I truly believe that most people are bisexual to some degree (like Kinsey did). Furthermore, I think that sexuality is a fairly fluid concept - there are many different things that can evolve a person's orientation over the course of their life, just as personality and other likes/dislikes can change. It's important to remember, though, that this has to be an organic change; attempting to force a change in a person's sexuality, no matter how much they may seem to want it, will almost always end in heartache and disappointment. Maybe instead of thinking about sexuality merely as one spectrum (from gay to straight), we should think about it two-dimensionally - like a light spectrum, with brightness/intensity of sexual passion on one axis to match the movement from the infrared of pure heterosexuality to the ultraviolet of pure homosexuality.

The idea of this inherent, universal bisexuality is the main reason that I listed myself on myspace the way that I did. However, in terms of life experience, to be perfectly honest with you, I would say that I am mostly 'straight'. I've never had sex with a man, although I have kissed a few on occasion, and I've also seen gay erotica/porn before, as well. A lot of the friends that I had in high school were very much the 'experimental' type - I went to some very interesting parties in those years, I must say. Because of that, I don't really know if the question of 'in' or 'out' really fully applies - among my close friends, no one would bat an eye if I said I found a man attractive, but that's mostly just because they are all really open, liberal-minded people in general. At the same time, though, I probably wouldn't volunteer that information around people that I didn't know as well. It's not a case of shame, or of wanting to hide a part of me, though - I also wouldn't volunteer that information if there was a woman that I found particularly attractive. That's just my personality in general, though - when I don't know people that well, I can be very shy and quiet, but if I'm around someone that I trust, I'm willing to volunteer almost any personal information.

The differing reactions towards male and female bisexuality (as well as attitudes towards gay men vs. lesbians) is a fascinating thing, though, isn't it? My personal theory is that it all springs from misogyny, and the traditional imbalance of power between men and women, as well as a general distrust of people who engage in sex for reasons of pleasure, rather than for reasons connected to either reproduction or psychological needs. Lesbians are "only" women, so for them to have sex with each other isn't that big of a deal for themisogynistically-minded person; when it's men doing it, though, it's inherently more frightening and taboo-breaking.

I've found that there are also a lot of people who have very interesting attitude about what qualifies as a homosexual encounter. I have heard people express opinions such as "two women can't have sex with each other, because there's no penetration" (something that isn't even always true of lesbian sex), "you're not gay if you're the one doing the penetrating", "it doesn't count as gay if it's only ablow-job , and not 'actual' sex", and "it doesn't count if you're somewhere where there's no women around, like prison or the army". I think it's sad that people can be either so ignorant, or so insecure about their self-identity that they would have to jump through rhetorical hoops like that in order to justify either their own behaviour or their attitudes.

If you don't mind my asking, Sarah, what made you want to ask this? Is it something you'd been wondering about for awhile, or just something that suddenly piqued your interest? If you have anything else you want to ask, feel free to, as well - as I said, when I trust someone, I'm more than willing to volunteer information about myself!

The difference between vegetarian and vegan

The difference between a vegetarian and vegan is "strictness" in eating habits. Vegans are more strict on a variety of wavelengths, as opposed to vegetarians because vegans avoid any food that has anything to do with an animal in general. Some theorists believe there is much more to contemplate on differences because most of the difference between vegetarianism and veganism has to do with ethics. Some individuals who are vegetarian have a specific reason for choosing the vegetarian route, whereas; individuals who choose the vegan route have more reasons for choosing the vegan lifestyle.

I'm a vegetarian (Lacto-ovo) and although I do not eat meat, I do eat eggs, dairy, and honey. I basically do not eat anything that has a head or once had a pulse. Unlike the Lacto-ovo, Lacto vegetarians do not eat meat, but also do not eat eggs. They do, however; consume dairy products and honey. Individual Ovo vegetarians do not consume meat, but also do not consume any dairy products. Ovo vegetarians do, however; eat eggs and honey. Vegans do not consume meat nor do they consume eggs, dairy, and honey.

Vegans are against animal testing more so than vegetarians are. Vegans are attracted to products not tested on animals and will not use a product tested on an animal, whereas; vegetarians have an acquired opinion on the animal products issue. Vegans will avoid a cosmetic company or any company that tests their products on animals, whereas; vegetarians won't avoid a cosmetic company because they test on animals (although, there are a few that do). Most vegetarians aren't opposed to wearing certain material that comes from animals. These materials can range from leather to fur and more. Keep in mind, some vegetarians are, but not as much as vegans. Vegans believe in the faux persuasion and do not wear anything that is on an animal wavelength.

Individuals who tend to be vegetarian, as opposed to vegan, are more "silent" on the issue because they still do consume certain products that certain individuals consider to be a part of an animal, whereas; most vegans tend to spread radical activism. I have a great friend who is a vegan and she has never once forced her lifestyle upon anyone else, however; she's in the minority in terms of spreading vegan awareness. Although it's common, some theorists believe it can also be the other way around.

Some critics believe that vegetarian and veganism are both unethical, however; the same can be said about any eating habit, let alone lifestyle.

http://www.helium.com/tm/338425/difference-between-vegetarian-vegan

Lasting principles of friendship in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

In Aristotle's "Nicomachean Ethics", Aristotle speaks about life on a variety of wavelengths. I've had the pleasure of reading this and I was quite satisfied with what I read. Although Aristotle speaks volumes of what is right and wrong, as well as, ordinarily accepted, it's approach to friendship is riveting. One of his primary focuses is friendship and although it is implied throughout all ten books, friendship is extremely and radically focused in books eight and nine. In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle elaborates that friendship is more than just a bond between two people, but something that should be valued. Aristotle discusses strengths and weaknesses of friendship and focuses on their value, as a result and also discusses everything from the beginning to the end, of a friendship.

Aristotle states in the beginning of book eight that there are only three kinds of friendships, but he does not describe them specifically. He states that in order to maintain any friendship, you must not change. There are instances, I agree, but life is not perfect and therefore; cannot agree. What if you meet someone who is physically unable to communicate from a trauma or what if you meet someone who has a sexual addiction and is in need of help? These are some thoughts to ponder. He then continues to speak about individualism in his own words and if people do not remain themselves or true to themselves, the friendship will eventually die. I think that is truly important, so I can understand his reason for stating such. Although, he uses examples of actions he does or doesn't like, some I do not agree with include his stereotypical words about Persians. As he gets towards the end of book eight, he starts talking about the origin of differences in friendships.

What was extremely impressive was in beginning of book nine when, Aristotle quoted in the beginning that "In all friendships between dissimilars it is, as we have said, proportion that equalizes the parties and preserves the friendship". I believe that Aristotle was simply saying that "we have the ability to like and love individuals who are different, despite our differences". He then continues to talk about reasons for maintaining a friendship based on action and not way of thinking, as everyone is different, therefore; has a different opinion on such issue. He continues to talk more about worth and goodwill and their relations to each other. Just because one does good things, doesn't mean they are good, although may seem good in a beginning of a friendship. I think he was basically stating that "things are not what they seem" which is very true. If you meet someone you think is a nice person, they may or may not be a nice person. As Aristotle continues, he talks about friends and specific reasons why individuals are friends and he starts to talk about presence and it's importance in a lasting friendship including how it makes an impact on one's reputation, as a result. Towards the end of book nine, Aristotle analyzes consciousness and focuses on how it develops through friendship. He also talks about improving oneself to save a friendship, but doesn't specifically state how to do so.

I like Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics and truly recommend this to anyone who wants to be inspired or who appreciates life, as well as, value, love, and friendship.

http://www.helium.com/tm/326379/aristotles-nicomachean-ethics-aristotle

What is equalism?

Everyone is individually different and possesses a lot of uniqueness that separates them from being the same. Since individuals are in fact different, does that mean they are not equal? Equalism is simply a promotion of equality that embraces the conception, all people should be treated as equal, despite their differences. This can be anything from the color of their skin to the religion they follow and much more.

The term "equalism" was created by philosophical originators and later applied to promote activism, including feminism. Equalism is most commonly known as a philosophy, based on it's premise of substance, but others believe it's more of a tool or guide to promote equality. Individuals who are more "pro" towards equalism believe that if an individual is black or an individual is white, despite the color of their skin, they are equal because they both bleed red.

Although it's been stated that equalism only applies to gender, race, and society, it applies to much more by association alone. In fact, when it comes to equalism associated with a person, a place, or a thing; equalism elaborates standard differences, but specifically promotes their equals and provides reasons for believing why.

Equalism plays a role in life and despite it's negatives, it's positives exceed as a result. Some theorists believe that equalism is a way of being "blind" to not just people, but to individual right from wrong. However; if someone's right is right for them, does it mean that it is right for you? Those are some thoughts to ponder.

http://www.helium.com/tm/326066/everyone-individually-different-possesses

What is liberal feminism

As one of the biggest civil rights movements in the 60s - 70s era, liberal feminism is simply a form of feminism that believes inequality can be cured on a variety of social and political wavelengths using social and political influences. Unlike radical feminism that believes in inequality of sameness, liberal feminism is the opposite. They strongly believe in fairness and only react if one of their own is devalued. Also known as liberalism, liberal feminism embraces the conception of individualism, despite the negatives and positives, as a result.

Individuals who are more "pro" towards liberal feminism tend to value tradition over anything else. The origin of liberal feminism is considered to be based on freewill, rather than laws and regulations. Liberal feminists tend to be more supportive and believe in promoting "pro choice" as a result. These women support everything from individual stereotype to prejudice to employment and more. Whether you are black or white, gothic or raver, you have their support. Liberal feminists are also very supportive of a variety of issues such as gay marriage and abortion, prostitution, and more. Liberal Feminists strongly believe that it's a woman's choice to do what she wants do with herself, including her body, regardless what it is or is not ethical to someone else.

Although some liberal feminists are praised for being not only deep thinkers, but free thinkers, some theorists even believe that liberal feminism ignore the moral values of life.

http://www.helium.com/tm/326030/biggest-civil-rights-movements